Critically evaluate the policy network model Essay

Critically evaluate the policy network model - Essay exercisingIn this case, we can expect too that solution can be best achieved through network of elucidation. NETWORK OF PROBLEMS AN OVERVIEW OF POLICY NETWORK MODEL first appearance In our society today, there are many things in which we are trying to explain and identify why such things occurs. We also try to dismember situations or problems to come up with a solution that we thought to be a result of the observations. Well, this is the essence of being an analysts - This give us the right to be coined as analysts because we try to explain everything based on the content and what the otherwise had perceived it to be and eventually lead us to do our own anomalous perception on that issue also with of course basis. In this part, we will be dealing on a policy model that is known to be one of the most influential models in these days in policy making. A policy network model by Rod Rhodes states that policy is alert because of the interactions made between the pressure groups and the policy makers. ... Policy Network Model As it were discussed and stated in the lecture presentation about policy depth psychology made by Dr. Adam White entitled Theories of the Policy Process, he identified there that a policy network model tenseness on policy subsystems. Primarily it focuses on subsystems because the actors involved may not be in line with the hierarchical structure. Leaders prerogative on matters of laws or policies and other matters which involved the state (individual level of analysis) is not the only source of policies as well as state laws because there are ten-fold actors involved in here. The players in this model are the groups that make the state work as a whole which is consist of the departments and bureaucracies as well as interests groups in the states. We can label them as the trans-governmental or transnational actors coined in the complex interdependence theory. The policy outcome is inde ed made because of the departments and bureaucracies intermediations with each other together with the interest groups. These components are the main actors bounded by their beliefs and norms in the society in governance (Scharpf 1998, p.195). Furthermore, actors operate through interdependent relationships, with a eyeshot to achieve their personal goals by collaborating with each other (Bevir & Richards 2009, p.1). In a broader sense, what makes the policy are not because of the leaders ability alone to rule and create policy to make its country better but rather, it is a product of collective individuals rational thinking ability shaped by their societal norms and its interactions to the government bureaus their exchange of resources and policy makers. Policy network analysis stresses the importance of